Saturday, March 18, 2017

Disney's "Beauty and the Beast" (2017)

Gotta go fast!
Shift into Turbo!
Run Barry, Run!
I wanna go fast!
Warp drive Mr. Scott!
They've gone to to plaid!

Why all this talk about going fast? Well that's EXACTLY the kind of breakneck pacing they tried to go for in the live-action remake of the Disney animated classic, "Beauty and the Beast."
It was as if the actors were just so impatient to spit out the familiar lines that there was no real emoting, no chance for the audience to connect with any line spoken or sung, and no way any of the nostalgia-laden viewers could remember the lines with fondness. What was the rush? To show us the new stuff and songs you added so it's not 100% a carbon copy of the original? Totally not worth it. The only worthwhile addition to the story that was added in this version was that we finally found out what happened to Belle's mom, and why she isn't with them in their dumpy little cottage that's smack dab IN their little town now instead of being on the outskirts.
To be fair though, there are many shining moments in this production that gives a slight improvement to the original.
Maurice is no longer a crackpot inventor, but a simple tinkerer and music box/clock-maker. He has progressed from a typical dopey Disney dad to being a competent human being. The audience can see all the subtle details of his agony of having to leave his wife, how he can sense his daughter's frustration in being trapped in old France's equivalent of the boonies, and he has the common sense to haul-ass when he realizes a spooky-ass castle is a straight up haunted mansion. Not to mention the golden opportunity to set the record straight on why the Beast imprisoned him in the original fable (rose theft), and not for simply being an intruder and sitting in his favorite chair like in the animated version. But with that change to make him much more relatable, that does make his attempted incarceration for being insane seem really out of place, and makes the villagers seem more like sheep to Gaston's smooth tongue.
The classic jock & sidekick routine is executed excellently with Luke Evans and Josh Gad as Gaston and LeFou...except for one minor exception. As most media outlets are only concerned with causing the most sensationalizing of headlines, they've picked up on the subtext that LeFou's character is now openly gay. As I've always believed LeFou was just in hero worship of Gaston, but this movie takes it to a definite push over the gay edge by lingering the camera on LeFou after Gaston leaves a scene to deliver some under-his-breath comment on just how much the diminutive sycophant was passionately pining for the hunk. Really nothing too gay, so conservatives can keep their monocles on and the LGBT community can feel represented. (And while Gaston's song about how great he is was never one of my favorite Disney songs, they surely elevated it to something familiar yet still as gloriously bombastic as the soundtrack version.)
And on the enchanted side of things, the feather duster of all people was given much more of a presence now instead of just being arm candy for Lumiere as she was back then. Lumiere is strangely enough the most animated of the household appliances since he was more motion-capture than the rest of the cast. Chip has turned into a faux skater boy now with his constant need of sliding around on his saucer. Funnily enough, they paired the wardrobe up with the Sir-Not-Appearing-in-This-Trailer of the harpsichord, voiced by Stanley Tucci.  And yes, "Be Our Guest" is still the scene-stealing wonder of a musical sequence as it was before, but now with the added bonus of Belle frustratingly trying to eat and drink despite the show, and a part where they suddenly go Bollywood and throw colorful powder about like it's Holi.
Further pluses include the adding of the enchantress who cursed them all in the prologue as an actual character instead of just the impetus for things to get rolling, and quite possibly having a thing with Maurice. The breathtaking aesthetic of the grand castle with its juxtaposition of both poshness and decay, as it's also a victim of the curse as with each rose petal falls, it crumbles further into ruin. Expanding the length of time for Belle and the Beast to get to develop their romance is always something I thought was lacking in the original, so the inclusion of actual bonding moments was appreciated.
As for the music part, ALL the familiar songs are in place with only some decent new songs to lengthen the chance for these actors to flex their pipes for the audience...with only a smattering of autotune. Emma Thompson sounds exactly like a younger Angela Lansbury with the iconic song and that's very commendable. The exceptionally great amongst the newcomer songs would have to be Beast's song called "Evermore," which he sings while watching Belle leave to save her father; truly a great song for when you're pining for a gal you can't have, rife with longing and sadness.
BUT! Like I said in the beginning, this movie is severely hampered by pacing issues, not putting their exceptional actors in more scenes together, having too much extra stuff which contributed nothing to the plot (new magical trinket left by the enchantress as another window to the outside world? Completely pointless...), and most cardinal of sins, letting me down on what I thought was ideal casting. Emma Watson was such a non-presence in the movie in certain parts, I was embarrassed to suddenly remember she was standing right there on the far side of the screen.
So despite my great enjoyment of the movie, it is a much weaker version of the tale as Disney has spun it. As a movie itself, it is a fine version to show folks, especially if it's their first time seeing the tale as old as time. But if you were to compare the two Disney movies, this one simply cannot hold a candle (or a candelabra) to the original Oscar-nominated masterpiece.

For a creative overview from a fellow movie-reviewing friend that lists three pros and three cons, please go here.
For funny yet spoilery synopsis disguised as a trailer, go here.

Just some fantastic cross-promotion months before the movie's actual promo material.

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Stranger Things

The funny thing about Netflix original content is that a lot of their shows can be seen as a whole movie. And that's what I did with "Stranger Things" since it essentially did feel like three movies put together covering the same something strange in the neighborhood.
Movie #1 and the main story: kids side.
The young stars pull off a lot of the characteristic charm of the same kind of protagonists from "ET," "Goonies," and other films that feature kids having to go up against the supernatural and situations way over their heads. The kids seem familiar yet completely fresh since they have the boisterousness, attitude, and general demeanor the audience has come to expect from an 80s movie but with a more professional kind of kid actor as you would see from movies in the modern era. Nothing about them screams "I HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO ACT" and in all truth, they sometimes act more like adults than the adult characters. How did they find these kids? I was genuinely invested in all their shenanigans, internal conflicts, their own nerdy know-how, and how much drive they displayed in wanting to achieve their goals.
Movie #2 and the stronger of the side stories: the adults.
Winona Ryder is the biggest big name actor of this little Netflix show and she acts with such passion and conviction that you almost forget she was Lydia from "Beetlejuice" and Kim from "Edward Scissorhands."  In light of her character's son suddenly becoming a victim of the ne'er-do-well from another dimension, she certainly looks like she's lost her marbles. And she plays it so very well. On the flip side is the police chief of their little Indiana town and right off the bat, we can tell he has his demons. Not until the last episode do we actually get to see why he's as gruff and bitter as he is. Yet, he is super driven, and him solving this missing person case which would lead to his own redemption is one of the most compelling parts of this series/movie. When their two stories converge, it is very gratifying seeing them become a duo of explorers into the unknown.
Movie #3 and what I thought would be a drag and eventually becoming a very compelling side story on its own: the teens.
Like any kind of teen drama full of popular teens, nerdy teens, sexual awakening, yelling at parents that they don't understand them, and cute girls treating freaks like people, this portion of the series was rife with clichés and overused tropes. And yet it diverges from this pointless melodrama and dives headlong into a revenge-driven story where teens be badass and kick supernatural ass a la "Evil Dead" and some of the "Nightmare on Elm Street" movies.  What I thought would be cardboard cutouts of characters become their own well-rounded characters with fears, foibles, real-seeming emotion, and gumption.
Overall, it is one of the biggest love letters to popular cinema from yesteryear, specifically the 1980s. While it gets a little weird, and a little wild, I highly recommend popping some Eggo waffles and watching this romp through these fantastic eight episodes of spooky goodness.
For a creative overview from a fellow movie-reviewing friend that lists three pros and three cons, please go here.

Because not only are little girls creepy and killers, they are also notorious for loving their snack foods.